<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 410 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds. The key legal principles involved were the deductibility of payments to unapproved gratuity funds under sec. 37, the non-inclusion of excise duty in closing stock, the proper allocation of interest-free advances from non-interest-bearing funds, and the allowance of depreciation on goodwill as an intangible asset under sec. 32(1)(ii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 410 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds. The key legal principles involved were the deductibility of payments to unapproved gratuity funds under sec. 37, the non-inclusion of excise duty in closing stock, the proper allocation of interest-free advances from non-interest-bearing funds, and the allowance of depreciation on goodwill as an intangible asset under sec. 32(1)(ii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>