<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 400 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221634</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the revision, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and reinstating the original decision of the Appellate Authority. The Court concluded that penalizing the assessee for importing plant and machinery, for which it was duly registered, was unwarranted based on the incorrect information provided during the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 400 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221634</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the revision, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and reinstating the original decision of the Appellate Authority. The Court concluded that penalizing the assessee for importing plant and machinery, for which it was duly registered, was unwarranted based on the incorrect information provided during the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>