<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 394 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221628</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction for market fee, ruling that Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, did not apply retrospectively to market fees. The Court emphasized the distinction between market fee and tax, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the deduction and highlighting the lack of challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s relevant order, weakening the appellant&#039;s position on legal issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 394 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221628</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction for market fee, ruling that Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, did not apply retrospectively to market fees. The Court emphasized the distinction between market fee and tax, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the deduction and highlighting the lack of challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s relevant order, weakening the appellant&#039;s position on legal issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>