<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 392 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Assessing Officer, upholding the decision that the capital reserve resulting from the amalgamation was a capital receipt and not taxable as business income under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also affirmed that the amalgamation was not considered an adventure in the nature of trade and that the provisions of Section 47(vi) and Section 47(vii) applied, exempting the transaction from capital gains tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 392 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Assessing Officer, upholding the decision that the capital reserve resulting from the amalgamation was a capital receipt and not taxable as business income under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also affirmed that the amalgamation was not considered an adventure in the nature of trade and that the provisions of Section 47(vi) and Section 47(vii) applied, exempting the transaction from capital gains tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>