<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 389 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221623</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the contempt petitions alleging breach of a court order regarding promotion quotas for different cadres within the Central Excise and Customs departments. It was held that the revised promotion quotas were meant to apply prospectively, and there was no requirement for retrospective implementation. The court clarified that ad hoc promotions during the interim period were not subject to the revised quota. Consequently, the respondents were found not in contempt of the court&#039;s order, resolving the dispute over the interpretation of the court directions on promotion ratios.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 389 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221623</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the contempt petitions alleging breach of a court order regarding promotion quotas for different cadres within the Central Excise and Customs departments. It was held that the revised promotion quotas were meant to apply prospectively, and there was no requirement for retrospective implementation. The court clarified that ad hoc promotions during the interim period were not subject to the revised quota. Consequently, the respondents were found not in contempt of the court&#039;s order, resolving the dispute over the interpretation of the court directions on promotion ratios.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>