<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 388 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 1,14,33,192/-, interest, and penalty. Despite the Revenue&#039;s objection that the activity undertaken did not amount to manufacture, the Tribunal found that the duty paid exceeded the denied credit, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit of dues and a stay on recovery during the appeal process. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, emphasizing that the duty payment made surpassed the denied credit, resulting in the stay of recovery during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:19:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 388 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 1,14,33,192/-, interest, and penalty. Despite the Revenue&#039;s objection that the activity undertaken did not amount to manufacture, the Tribunal found that the duty paid exceeded the denied credit, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit of dues and a stay on recovery during the appeal process. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, emphasizing that the duty payment made surpassed the denied credit, resulting in the stay of recovery during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>