<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 372 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221606</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the approval granted by the Director of STPI under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, affirmed the revenue nature of software expenses, and clarified the interpretation of conditions under Section 10A(2) for software technology parks. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law requiring determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 372 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221606</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the approval granted by the Director of STPI under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, affirmed the revenue nature of software expenses, and clarified the interpretation of conditions under Section 10A(2) for software technology parks. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law requiring determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>