<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 370 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221604</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2004-2005. The Court found that the assessee had disclosed all relevant particulars regarding the income from the assignment of business, including the accounting policy adopted. It concluded that there was no concealment of income to warrant the imposition of the penalty, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 370 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221604</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2004-2005. The Court found that the assessee had disclosed all relevant particulars regarding the income from the assignment of business, including the accounting policy adopted. It concluded that there was no concealment of income to warrant the imposition of the penalty, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>