<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 369 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged that the delay in filing the appeals was condoned as the applicants filed within three months of receiving the impugned order. The matter was adjourned for further consideration of the stay application, with status quo to be maintained until the next hearing scheduled for 25.03.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:16:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 369 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged that the delay in filing the appeals was condoned as the applicants filed within three months of receiving the impugned order. The matter was adjourned for further consideration of the stay application, with status quo to be maintained until the next hearing scheduled for 25.03.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>