<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 368 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221602</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent regarding the valuation of an imported second-hand printing press. The tribunal found that the value enhancement lacked proper justification, the respondent was not given a chance to address the issue, and the reliance on a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate was unjustified. Emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to customs valuation rules, the judgment highlighted the importance of concrete evidence in disputing declared values and the rejection of transaction values based solely on certificates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 368 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221602</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent regarding the valuation of an imported second-hand printing press. The tribunal found that the value enhancement lacked proper justification, the respondent was not given a chance to address the issue, and the reliance on a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate was unjustified. Emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to customs valuation rules, the judgment highlighted the importance of concrete evidence in disputing declared values and the rejection of transaction values based solely on certificates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>