<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 363 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221597</link>
    <description>The rebate claims were not admissible as the goods were not exported in compliance with the mandatory conditions of Notification No. 43/2001-C.E. (N.T.). Penalties imposed under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 were set aside. The duty paid by the applicant was to be refunded as per Section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The revision application was allowed to the extent of modifying the impugned order-in-appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 363 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221597</link>
      <description>The rebate claims were not admissible as the goods were not exported in compliance with the mandatory conditions of Notification No. 43/2001-C.E. (N.T.). Penalties imposed under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 were set aside. The duty paid by the applicant was to be refunded as per Section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The revision application was allowed to the extent of modifying the impugned order-in-appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>