https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221588 The appellate authority ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the demand for service tax on handling and transportation charges was not sustainable. The invocation of the extended period for the demand was deemed unjustified as there was no deliberate evasion and the appellant genuinely believed the charges were not taxable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order-in-original. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221588 The appellate authority ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the demand for service tax on handling and transportation charges was not sustainable. The invocation of the extended period for the demand was deemed unjustified as there was no deliberate evasion and the appellant genuinely believed the charges were not taxable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order-in-original. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221588