<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 339 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221573</link>
    <description>The writ petition against a privatized entity seeking the difference in VRS amount based on revised pay scales and D.A. was dismissed by the Court on the ground of maintainability. The Court held that after privatization, the entity no longer had public duties, making the writ petition inappropriate. The Court did not address the merits of the claim, suggesting the petitioners seek alternative remedies in the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 339 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221573</link>
      <description>The writ petition against a privatized entity seeking the difference in VRS amount based on revised pay scales and D.A. was dismissed by the Court on the ground of maintainability. The Court held that after privatization, the entity no longer had public duties, making the writ petition inappropriate. The Court did not address the merits of the claim, suggesting the petitioners seek alternative remedies in the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>