<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 334 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the exemption of Service Tax on services provided to foreign clients. The Tribunal found that the appellants had provided evidence of services to foreign clients and that the non-reflection of foreign commission in the Profit &amp;amp; Loss account did not invalidate their claim. The Tribunal also held that the Show Cause Notice for Service Tax demand was time-barred and that the invocation of a longer period for tax demand based on assumptions was unjustifiable. The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed and provided consequential relief to the appellants, highlighting the importance of proper evidence and legal interpretation in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 334 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the exemption of Service Tax on services provided to foreign clients. The Tribunal found that the appellants had provided evidence of services to foreign clients and that the non-reflection of foreign commission in the Profit &amp;amp; Loss account did not invalidate their claim. The Tribunal also held that the Show Cause Notice for Service Tax demand was time-barred and that the invocation of a longer period for tax demand based on assumptions was unjustifiable. The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed and provided consequential relief to the appellants, highlighting the importance of proper evidence and legal interpretation in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>