<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 313 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221547</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling that the petitioner was not liable to pay the penalty under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment emphasized the validity of the Finance Act, 2000, particularly Section 117, which clarified that penalties could not be imposed based on the Explanation under Section 117. The Court dismissed the challenge against the penalty imposition, affirming the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the Finance Acts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 313 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221547</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal, ruling that the petitioner was not liable to pay the penalty under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment emphasized the validity of the Finance Act, 2000, particularly Section 117, which clarified that penalties could not be imposed based on the Explanation under Section 117. The Court dismissed the challenge against the penalty imposition, affirming the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the Finance Acts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>