<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 311 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221545</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the tax liability under Works&#039; Contract services from 1.6.2007, upheld the invocation of the extended period of limitation, and dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants, emphasizing that ignorance of the law does not excuse non-compliance and justifying the penalties imposed based on the Department&#039;s investigation findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 05:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 311 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221545</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the tax liability under Works&#039; Contract services from 1.6.2007, upheld the invocation of the extended period of limitation, and dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants, emphasizing that ignorance of the law does not excuse non-compliance and justifying the penalties imposed based on the Department&#039;s investigation findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>