<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 308 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221542</link>
    <description>The Court held that trade discounts should not be included in the total turnover for computing deductions under Section 80HHC of the Act. The judgment favored the assessee, reversing the Tribunal&#039;s decision and allowing the appeals based on previous case law. The Court emphasized the distinction between trade discounts and cash discounts, stating that trade discounts do not reduce the sale price and should be excluded from total turnover calculations. The decision was in favor of the assessee, and the Tribunal&#039;s judgment was reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 308 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221542</link>
      <description>The Court held that trade discounts should not be included in the total turnover for computing deductions under Section 80HHC of the Act. The judgment favored the assessee, reversing the Tribunal&#039;s decision and allowing the appeals based on previous case law. The Court emphasized the distinction between trade discounts and cash discounts, stating that trade discounts do not reduce the sale price and should be excluded from total turnover calculations. The decision was in favor of the assessee, and the Tribunal&#039;s judgment was reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>