https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221536 The demand was not stayed unconditionally; the petitioner was required to pay the amount within the stipulated time before any further adjustment could be considered. Only after such payment were the respondents to examine the petitioner's later representations for additional adjustment of amounts allegedly due from the State. If any sum was found adjustable or refundable, appropriate adjustment or refund was to follow. The document therefore reflects a conditional relief structure: immediate protection against the demand was refused, but reconsideration of subsequent adjustment claims was preserved subject to prior payment. en-us Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Mar 2013 06:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221536 The demand was not stayed unconditionally; the petitioner was required to pay the amount within the stipulated time before any further adjustment could be considered. Only after such payment were the respondents to examine the petitioner's later representations for additional adjustment of amounts allegedly due from the State. If any sum was found adjustable or refundable, appropriate adjustment or refund was to follow. The document therefore reflects a conditional relief structure: immediate protection against the demand was refused, but reconsideration of subsequent adjustment claims was preserved subject to prior payment. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221536