https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221534 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, rejecting the Revenue's argument that the appeal was time-barred. The Tribunal found that the appellant had complied with Section 37C of the Central Excise Act by notifying the department of their address change in 2007, which the department failed to acknowledge. As a result, the Tribunal deemed the service of the order defective and allowed the appeal to proceed within the limitation period. The Registry was instructed to schedule further consideration of the stay application. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221534 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, rejecting the Revenue's argument that the appeal was time-barred. The Tribunal found that the appellant had complied with Section 37C of the Central Excise Act by notifying the department of their address change in 2007, which the department failed to acknowledge. As a result, the Tribunal deemed the service of the order defective and allowed the appeal to proceed within the limitation period. The Registry was instructed to schedule further consideration of the stay application. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221534