https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221531 Detention of a lubricant oil consignment under the KVAT Act was found unjustified where the goods were supported by a purchase order, tax invoice and delivery note, and were stated to have already suffered CST. On those facts, no prima facie irregularity was shown to justify continued detention. The Court allowed adjudication proceedings to continue under the Act, but directed release of the consignment on the petitioner executing a bond without sureties, reflecting that detention pending adjudication was not warranted on the material produced. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:17:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221531 Detention of a lubricant oil consignment under the KVAT Act was found unjustified where the goods were supported by a purchase order, tax invoice and delivery note, and were stated to have already suffered CST. On those facts, no prima facie irregularity was shown to justify continued detention. The Court allowed adjudication proceedings to continue under the Act, but directed release of the consignment on the petitioner executing a bond without sureties, reflecting that detention pending adjudication was not warranted on the material produced. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221531