https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221523 The court held in favor of the petitioner, ruling that they were not obligated to pay the remaining 50% of the demand as per the interpretation of the stay order issued by the appellate authority. Despite recovery proceedings being initiated, the court found that since the petitioner had already remitted 50% and the appeal was pending, there was no justification to compel payment of the balance amount. The court directed that recovery proceedings for the remaining amount be stayed until the appeal was disposed of. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:15:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221523 The court held in favor of the petitioner, ruling that they were not obligated to pay the remaining 50% of the demand as per the interpretation of the stay order issued by the appellate authority. Despite recovery proceedings being initiated, the court found that since the petitioner had already remitted 50% and the appeal was pending, there was no justification to compel payment of the balance amount. The court directed that recovery proceedings for the remaining amount be stayed until the appeal was disposed of. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221523