<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 274 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand under &#039;rent-a-cab service&#039; against the appellant, requiring a predeposit of Rs.2.5 lakhs within six weeks. The appellant&#039;s activity was deemed to constitute operating a rent-a-cab scheme, aligning with legal precedents and Section 65(91) of the Finance Act, 1994. Compliance with the predeposit would result in a waiver and stay of recovery for penalty, interest, and the outstanding service tax amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 274 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand under &#039;rent-a-cab service&#039; against the appellant, requiring a predeposit of Rs.2.5 lakhs within six weeks. The appellant&#039;s activity was deemed to constitute operating a rent-a-cab scheme, aligning with legal precedents and Section 65(91) of the Finance Act, 1994. Compliance with the predeposit would result in a waiver and stay of recovery for penalty, interest, and the outstanding service tax amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>