<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 267 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221501</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the lower authorities&#039; decision to adopt the sale consideration at Rs.6,48,000, based on a sale agreement, for calculating long-term capital gains from a property sale. The court emphasized the wife&#039;s signature on the agreement and the purchasers&#039; acknowledgment of paying Rs.6,48,000. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding lack of authorization for the agreement, the court found no legal flaws in the lower authorities&#039; rulings. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the revenue, concluding that the substantial legal question was resolved in favor of the revenue without any legal defects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 267 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221501</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the lower authorities&#039; decision to adopt the sale consideration at Rs.6,48,000, based on a sale agreement, for calculating long-term capital gains from a property sale. The court emphasized the wife&#039;s signature on the agreement and the purchasers&#039; acknowledgment of paying Rs.6,48,000. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding lack of authorization for the agreement, the court found no legal flaws in the lower authorities&#039; rulings. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the revenue, concluding that the substantial legal question was resolved in favor of the revenue without any legal defects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>