<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 264 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221498</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, for the assessment year 2005-2006. The Court ruled that penalties cannot be imposed solely based on income estimation without clear evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the necessity of establishing clear evidence for penalties under the mentioned section. The Court highlighted the importance of proving concealment or inaccuracies for penalty imposition, ultimately ruling against the Revenue and affirming the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 264 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221498</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, for the assessment year 2005-2006. The Court ruled that penalties cannot be imposed solely based on income estimation without clear evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the necessity of establishing clear evidence for penalties under the mentioned section. The Court highlighted the importance of proving concealment or inaccuracies for penalty imposition, ultimately ruling against the Revenue and affirming the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>