https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221496 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the adjudicating authority's decision to reject further adjournment requests. It found the authority acted reasonably within statutory limits and that the petitioners had sufficient time to approach the Settlement Commission. Emphasizing the availability of a statutory appeal, the court held that the petitioners failed to demonstrate extraordinary reasons to bypass the appeal process. The court clarified that the petitioners could challenge the adjudicating authority's order before the appellate authority upon filing an appeal within three weeks. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221496 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the adjudicating authority's decision to reject further adjournment requests. It found the authority acted reasonably within statutory limits and that the petitioners had sufficient time to approach the Settlement Commission. Emphasizing the availability of a statutory appeal, the court held that the petitioners failed to demonstrate extraordinary reasons to bypass the appeal process. The court clarified that the petitioners could challenge the adjudicating authority's order before the appellate authority upon filing an appeal within three weeks. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221496