<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221490</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for individual duty liability determination and penalty assessment, following the precedent set by the Gujarat High Court. The decision emphasized the importance of segregating individual liabilities in cases of fraudulent rebate of Central Excise duty. The Tribunal clarified that its ruling did not address the merits of the case, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings to establish individual demands and penalties, ensuring a fair resolution regarding joint recovery of duty among multiple parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 256 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221490</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for individual duty liability determination and penalty assessment, following the precedent set by the Gujarat High Court. The decision emphasized the importance of segregating individual liabilities in cases of fraudulent rebate of Central Excise duty. The Tribunal clarified that its ruling did not address the merits of the case, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings to establish individual demands and penalties, ensuring a fair resolution regarding joint recovery of duty among multiple parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>