<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 244 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221478</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, allowing lease rentals as business expenditure for the assessment years 1996-1997 and 2001-2002. The court found that the nature of the lease agreement and the treatment of lease rentals were in line with previous judgments. Consequently, the court dismissed both appeals without imposing any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 244 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221478</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, allowing lease rentals as business expenditure for the assessment years 1996-1997 and 2001-2002. The court found that the nature of the lease agreement and the treatment of lease rentals were in line with previous judgments. Consequently, the court dismissed both appeals without imposing any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>