<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 242 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221476</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2003-2004. The decision was based on the lack of any substantial question of law, with findings on facts and evidence appreciation aligning with previous judgments. The Tribunal&#039;s affirmation of the CIT(A)&#039;s partial deletion of additions by the Assessing Officer was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 242 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221476</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2003-2004. The decision was based on the lack of any substantial question of law, with findings on facts and evidence appreciation aligning with previous judgments. The Tribunal&#039;s affirmation of the CIT(A)&#039;s partial deletion of additions by the Assessing Officer was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>