https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221466 The case addressed issues of noncompliance with a Supreme Court order by Government officers, their liability for inaction, reassurance of Supreme Court orders, and the enforcement mechanism for such orders. The Public Information Officer (PIO) and First Appellate Authority (FAA) emphasized their limited role under the RTI Act, stating they cannot interpret laws or judgments to take action against authorities. The appellant's inquiries were dismissed as not falling within the Act's definition of information, emphasizing the need for tangible records or data for RTI requests. The case outcome upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to the lack of alignment with the Act's criteria for information. en-us Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221466 The case addressed issues of noncompliance with a Supreme Court order by Government officers, their liability for inaction, reassurance of Supreme Court orders, and the enforcement mechanism for such orders. The Public Information Officer (PIO) and First Appellate Authority (FAA) emphasized their limited role under the RTI Act, stating they cannot interpret laws or judgments to take action against authorities. The appellant's inquiries were dismissed as not falling within the Act's definition of information, emphasizing the need for tangible records or data for RTI requests. The case outcome upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to the lack of alignment with the Act's criteria for information. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221466