<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221458</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside penalties imposed on the appellant under Section 76 &amp;amp; 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s timely payment of service tax without a show-cause notice, as allowed under Section 73(3) and supported by a Board circular, rendered the penalties unjustified. The decision emphasizes the significance of prompt tax payments and the legal framework permitting self-ascertainment and payment without formal notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221458</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside penalties imposed on the appellant under Section 76 &amp;amp; 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s timely payment of service tax without a show-cause notice, as allowed under Section 73(3) and supported by a Board circular, rendered the penalties unjustified. The decision emphasizes the significance of prompt tax payments and the legal framework permitting self-ascertainment and payment without formal notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>