<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 217 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221451</link>
    <description>Where a company&#039;s memorandum, financing pattern and share-holding activity show a continuing business of investing in, buying, selling and dealing in shares, borrowings used to acquire those shares are treated as for business purposes and the related interest is deductible. The classification of share-sale proceeds in the accounts does not control their true character; substance prevails over accounting nomenclature. On that basis, interest on borrowed funds was allowable as a business deduction and the share transaction receipts were assessed as business income, with no interference warranted where the Tribunal&#039;s view was not shown to be perverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 05:05:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 217 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221451</link>
      <description>Where a company&#039;s memorandum, financing pattern and share-holding activity show a continuing business of investing in, buying, selling and dealing in shares, borrowings used to acquire those shares are treated as for business purposes and the related interest is deductible. The classification of share-sale proceeds in the accounts does not control their true character; substance prevails over accounting nomenclature. On that basis, interest on borrowed funds was allowable as a business deduction and the share transaction receipts were assessed as business income, with no interference warranted where the Tribunal&#039;s view was not shown to be perverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>