<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 189 - BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221422</link>
    <description>The government resolved the dispute in favor of the applicant regarding the eligibility of Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) for drawback under entry No. 2207 10 90. The impugned orders were set aside, and the cases were remanded to the adjudicating authority for a decision based on the clarification provided by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The revision applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 189 - BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221422</link>
      <description>The government resolved the dispute in favor of the applicant regarding the eligibility of Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) for drawback under entry No. 2207 10 90. The impugned orders were set aside, and the cases were remanded to the adjudicating authority for a decision based on the clarification provided by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The revision applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>