<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 187 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221420</link>
    <description>Where exempted goods arise only as an inevitable and unavoidable waste or by-product in manufacture, Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 cannot be mechanically invoked on a prima facie basis to demand an amount linked to sale value. The Tribunal noted that the rule is in pari materia with the earlier Rule 57CC and accepted that, where separate accounts for common inputs used in dutiable and exempted outputs cannot be maintained because it is impossible in practice, the law does not compel impossibilities. On that footing, the appellant showed a prima facie case and undue hardship, so pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:42:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 187 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221420</link>
      <description>Where exempted goods arise only as an inevitable and unavoidable waste or by-product in manufacture, Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 cannot be mechanically invoked on a prima facie basis to demand an amount linked to sale value. The Tribunal noted that the rule is in pari materia with the earlier Rule 57CC and accepted that, where separate accounts for common inputs used in dutiable and exempted outputs cannot be maintained because it is impossible in practice, the law does not compel impossibilities. On that footing, the appellant showed a prima facie case and undue hardship, so pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>