<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 185 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221418</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs and capital goods of a de-bonded 100% EOU was correctly availed by the domestic unit even though the debonding certificate had not yet been issued. Because both units operated in the same and there was no separate EOU registration, the goods were treated as having moved notionally to the DTA unit despite the absence of physical removal or a separate invoice-based transfer. As the credit itself was validly taken after payment of applicable duties on debonding, the demand for interest failed because its basis disappeared.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 185 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221418</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs and capital goods of a de-bonded 100% EOU was correctly availed by the domestic unit even though the debonding certificate had not yet been issued. Because both units operated in the same and there was no separate EOU registration, the goods were treated as having moved notionally to the DTA unit despite the absence of physical removal or a separate invoice-based transfer. As the credit itself was validly taken after payment of applicable duties on debonding, the demand for interest failed because its basis disappeared.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>