<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 184 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding shortages in finished goods and raw materials, emphasizing the need for independent evidence to establish clandestine removal. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the decision to set aside penalties related to shortages. Additionally, the confirmation of demand concerning availed Cenvat credit on Furnace oil was overturned due to the acknowledgment of trial basis use, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:34:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 184 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding shortages in finished goods and raw materials, emphasizing the need for independent evidence to establish clandestine removal. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, supporting the decision to set aside penalties related to shortages. Additionally, the confirmation of demand concerning availed Cenvat credit on Furnace oil was overturned due to the acknowledgment of trial basis use, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>