<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 178 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to reject the appeal due to a significant delay of over two years in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s claim of improper service of the order-in-original was dismissed as they had not updated their address for communication despite receiving the personal hearing notice. The Tribunal cited a Supreme Court judgment to support the decision that such a delay could not be condoned, affirming the rejection of the appeal and emphasizing the importance of timely filing and proper communication with authorities in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:09:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 178 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to reject the appeal due to a significant delay of over two years in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s claim of improper service of the order-in-original was dismissed as they had not updated their address for communication despite receiving the personal hearing notice. The Tribunal cited a Supreme Court judgment to support the decision that such a delay could not be condoned, affirming the rejection of the appeal and emphasizing the importance of timely filing and proper communication with authorities in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>