<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 171 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s method of valuing non-moving stock at 5% of the purchase cost, remanding the matter for verification. Sales-tax and Excise duty were directed to be excluded from total turnover. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was set aside pending fresh adjudication of the valuation issue. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:08:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 171 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s method of valuing non-moving stock at 5% of the purchase cost, remanding the matter for verification. Sales-tax and Excise duty were directed to be excluded from total turnover. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was set aside pending fresh adjudication of the valuation issue. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>