https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221393 The Appellate Tribunal rejected all three appeals filed by the revenue, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of establishing verifiable evidence in cases of duty evasion allegations, highlighting that suspicion alone cannot serve as evidence, and photocopies of documents are not considered genuine proof. en-us Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221393 The Appellate Tribunal rejected all three appeals filed by the revenue, affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of establishing verifiable evidence in cases of duty evasion allegations, highlighting that suspicion alone cannot serve as evidence, and photocopies of documents are not considered genuine proof. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221393