<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 144 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221377</link>
    <description>A person who files bills of entry and holds out as importer of a vessel can be fastened with customs duty on bunkers, stores and later received diesel found on board and used in the marine spread, where the duty position was not regularised. Confiscation of the vessels, however, cannot be sustained without notice to the owners, who were distinct from the charterer and importer, so that confiscation was set aside with consequential relief. Confiscation and redemption fine on the bunkers, lubricants, paints and grease were upheld, and penalties were broadly sustained against the principal commercial actors, while relief was granted where direct involvement was not adequately established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 07:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 144 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221377</link>
      <description>A person who files bills of entry and holds out as importer of a vessel can be fastened with customs duty on bunkers, stores and later received diesel found on board and used in the marine spread, where the duty position was not regularised. Confiscation of the vessels, however, cannot be sustained without notice to the owners, who were distinct from the charterer and importer, so that confiscation was set aside with consequential relief. Confiscation and redemption fine on the bunkers, lubricants, paints and grease were upheld, and penalties were broadly sustained against the principal commercial actors, while relief was granted where direct involvement was not adequately established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>