<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 127 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221360</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that the lease agreements were genuine, and the lessor retained ownership of the assets. The court held that the lease rentals were allowable as business expenditure, citing relevant case law and principles regarding ownership during leasing. The court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue, with costs not awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 127 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221360</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that the lease agreements were genuine, and the lessor retained ownership of the assets. The court held that the lease rentals were allowable as business expenditure, citing relevant case law and principles regarding ownership during leasing. The court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue, with costs not awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>