https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221350 The tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that the appellant correctly followed Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal found that the manufacturing process resulted in both dutiable and exempted products, supporting the appellant's position. Citing relevant case law, the tribunal emphasized the continuous manufacture and sale of main and subsidiary products. The tribunal set aside the incorrect order, providing consequential relief to the appellant and highlighting the significance of accurate interpretation of manufacturing processes and product classifications under the CENVAT Credit Rules. en-us Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221350 The tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that the appellant correctly followed Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal found that the manufacturing process resulted in both dutiable and exempted products, supporting the appellant's position. Citing relevant case law, the tribunal emphasized the continuous manufacture and sale of main and subsidiary products. The tribunal set aside the incorrect order, providing consequential relief to the appellant and highlighting the significance of accurate interpretation of manufacturing processes and product classifications under the CENVAT Credit Rules. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221350