<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 113 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221346</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the petition, requiring the petitioner to deposit a specified amount and furnish security within a set timeframe. Compliance would waive the pre-deposit requirement for the remaining amount, allowing the Tribunal to consider the appeals on merits. Failure to meet the stipulated requirements within the specified time would lead the Tribunal to consider non-fulfillment of pre-deposit conditions. No costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 113 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221346</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the petition, requiring the petitioner to deposit a specified amount and furnish security within a set timeframe. Compliance would waive the pre-deposit requirement for the remaining amount, allowing the Tribunal to consider the appeals on merits. Failure to meet the stipulated requirements within the specified time would lead the Tribunal to consider non-fulfillment of pre-deposit conditions. No costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>