<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 111 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221344</link>
    <description>Where the assessee&#039;s appeal and stay application were pending before the appellate authority, the HC held that immediate recovery of the disputed demand could prejudice the assessee. Interim protection was therefore granted, and recovery was restrained until the next date or until the stay application was decided by the appellate authority, whichever was earlier.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 111 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221344</link>
      <description>Where the assessee&#039;s appeal and stay application were pending before the appellate authority, the HC held that immediate recovery of the disputed demand could prejudice the assessee. Interim protection was therefore granted, and recovery was restrained until the next date or until the stay application was decided by the appellate authority, whichever was earlier.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>