<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 108 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221341</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the order granting sales tax exemption to the petitioner was binding on the respondent, and any tax collected during the exemption period was unauthorized and should be refunded. Citing legal principles, the court deemed the rejection of the refund claim as illegal and directed the respondent to issue fresh orders for the refund within four weeks, in compliance with the original exemption order&#039;s limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 108 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221341</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the order granting sales tax exemption to the petitioner was binding on the respondent, and any tax collected during the exemption period was unauthorized and should be refunded. Citing legal principles, the court deemed the rejection of the refund claim as illegal and directed the respondent to issue fresh orders for the refund within four weeks, in compliance with the original exemption order&#039;s limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>