<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 106 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed demands of Service Tax against the applicants for rent a cab services but not for tour operator services. The appellants were directed to deposit 50% of the demands confirmed against rent a cab services to stay recovery during the appeal. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for demands confirmed against tour operator services. Concerns of double taxation were addressed, emphasizing the need to differentiate between tour operator and rent a cab services based on definitions under the Finance Act, 1994. Compliance verification was scheduled for the required deposit within the specified timeline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 106 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed demands of Service Tax against the applicants for rent a cab services but not for tour operator services. The appellants were directed to deposit 50% of the demands confirmed against rent a cab services to stay recovery during the appeal. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for demands confirmed against tour operator services. Concerns of double taxation were addressed, emphasizing the need to differentiate between tour operator and rent a cab services based on definitions under the Finance Act, 1994. Compliance verification was scheduled for the required deposit within the specified timeline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>