<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221338</link>
    <description>At the stay stage, amounts retained by an advertising agency as write-backs were treated prima facie as part of the taxable consideration, and the Board circular supporting tax on the gross amount less payments to media weighed against full waiver; pre-deposit of 25% of the confirmed demand was directed for that component. For the separate demand relating to volume discounts received from media, factual parity with an earlier Tribunal order and the assessee&#039;s inability to choose the advertiser supported complete waiver of pre-deposit. The stay application was thus allowed in part, with partial relief confined to the write-backs demand and full waiver granted for the volume-discount demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221338</link>
      <description>At the stay stage, amounts retained by an advertising agency as write-backs were treated prima facie as part of the taxable consideration, and the Board circular supporting tax on the gross amount less payments to media weighed against full waiver; pre-deposit of 25% of the confirmed demand was directed for that component. For the separate demand relating to volume discounts received from media, factual parity with an earlier Tribunal order and the assessee&#039;s inability to choose the advertiser supported complete waiver of pre-deposit. The stay application was thus allowed in part, with partial relief confined to the write-backs demand and full waiver granted for the volume-discount demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>