<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221328</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of considering the specific circumstances of the case, such as the Demat form of share transaction, in determining the applicability of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The judgment highlights the significance of providing substantial evidence and adhering to legal provisions while assessing income from share transactions to prevent unwarranted additions under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 95 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221328</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of considering the specific circumstances of the case, such as the Demat form of share transaction, in determining the applicability of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The judgment highlights the significance of providing substantial evidence and adhering to legal provisions while assessing income from share transactions to prevent unwarranted additions under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>