<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 91 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221324</link>
    <description>The Court directed the testing of goods by a competent laboratory before finalizing adjudication proceedings. The respondents were instructed to complete confiscation proceedings within a specified time frame and issue appropriate orders based on the General Notes Regarding Import Policy. The Writ Petition was disposed of, with the adjudicating authority directed to pass necessary orders within two weeks after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 91 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221324</link>
      <description>The Court directed the testing of goods by a competent laboratory before finalizing adjudication proceedings. The respondents were instructed to complete confiscation proceedings within a specified time frame and issue appropriate orders based on the General Notes Regarding Import Policy. The Writ Petition was disposed of, with the adjudicating authority directed to pass necessary orders within two weeks after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>