<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 90 -  GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221323</link>
    <description>The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The petitioner&#039;s argument that the company being registered in Shillong conferred jurisdiction was rejected. The court held that the cause of action did not arise within the Gauhati High Court&#039;s jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to seek redressal in the appropriate court, and the interim order was vacated without costs being awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 90 -  GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221323</link>
      <description>The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The petitioner&#039;s argument that the company being registered in Shillong conferred jurisdiction was rejected. The court held that the cause of action did not arise within the Gauhati High Court&#039;s jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to seek redressal in the appropriate court, and the interim order was vacated without costs being awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>