https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221316 A revised assessment order was not shown to be vitiated by breach of natural justice where the assessment record showed that the taxpayer had raised multiple objections, including the Rule 10(2) point, and the Assessing Officer had expressly considered and rejected them. The challenge on that ground therefore failed. The writ petition was also not entertained because the proper remedy, if the taxpayer remained aggrieved by the interpretation of Rule 10(2), was to pursue the statutory appellate or other remedies rather than invoke writ jurisdiction against the assessment order. en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:04:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221316 A revised assessment order was not shown to be vitiated by breach of natural justice where the assessment record showed that the taxpayer had raised multiple objections, including the Rule 10(2) point, and the Assessing Officer had expressly considered and rejected them. The challenge on that ground therefore failed. The writ petition was also not entertained because the proper remedy, if the taxpayer remained aggrieved by the interpretation of Rule 10(2), was to pursue the statutory appellate or other remedies rather than invoke writ jurisdiction against the assessment order. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221316